IMEU Logo
The Institute for Middle East Understanding offers journalists and editors quick access to information about Palestine and the Palestinians, as well as expert sources — both in the U.S. and in the Middle East. Read our Background Briefings. Contact us for story assistance. Sign up for e-briefings.
Institute for Middle East UnderstandingAnalysis
Donate to IMEU
Home
News & Analysis
Commentary
From the MediaLife & Culture
Cuisine
Customs & Traditions
Film
Literature
Performing Arts
Visual Arts
Palestine in Photos
Art & Culture
Business & Economy
Daily Life
People
Politics
Palestinian Americans
Background Briefings
Documents & Reports
Development & Economy
Historical Documents
Human Rights
Politics & Democracy
Misc.
Maps
Links
Media Inquiries
About IMEU
Donate
Contact

Get E-mail News
Journalists & Editors: Sign up for e-mail briefings here.
EDITOR'S PICKS

Backgrounder on the barrier in Ni'lin
IMEU


Actor and filmmaker Jennifer Jajeh
IMEU


Remembering Mahmoud Darwish
Al Jazeera TV


SEARCH
Advanced Search
Home > News & Analysis > Analysis
Winograd and the peace process
Khader Khader, Bitterlemons.org, May 8, 2007
Print This PageE-mail This PageBookmark This PageIMEU Life and Culture RSS


This article was originally published by Bitterlemons.org and is republished with permission.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas meets with the EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana at the Arab Summit in Riyadh. (Maan Images)
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas meets with the EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana at the Arab Summit in Riyadh. (Maan Images)
No Palestinian really believed that a new opportunity for the peace process was actually emerging in the past few months after the reactivation of the Arab peace initiative. Palestinians have become experienced in Israeli-American tactics to give the impression that efforts are being exerted for the sake of the peace process while at the same time facts on the ground lead nowhere.

Wishful thinking, on the other hand, pushed some to believe that since the Palestinians agreed on a national unity program and government - which represents more than 95 percent of the Palestinians in the occupied Palestinian territories and which called for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state within the 1967 borders along with a just solution to the Palestinian refugee problem based on UN General Assembly Resolution 194 - and given the Arab countries' move to re-launch the Arab peace initiative and provide political support to the Palestinian people in their quest for peace, a real opportunity emerged for the Palestinians and Arabs to attack Israel with a peace offensive that could have gained the approval of the international community.

However, and amid the 'cautious' international euphoria, the Winograd interim report came out to smash all dreams and bring Palestinians back to reality. The content of the report and the severe criticism launched against the main political players in the Israeli government means that Israel is no longer in a position to allow it to deal with any peace process with the Palestinians for some time in the future even if Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has stated on many occasions that he is ready at any moment to meet with 'moderate' Arab leaders in public to discuss the Arab peace initiative.

Related stories






Apart from its immediate impact on the political system in Israel and with the growing possibilities for early elections, the Winograd report thus came also to serve several parties involved in the Middle East peace process.

Taking into consideration the weak and 'fragile' political position of the current Israeli government, the United States can feel relieved of any potential pressure exerted by the Palestinians or Arabs to push toward Palestinian-Israeli final status negotiations. In fact, the most recent US document on mutual measures and timetables between Israel and the PA is a clear proof of the American position. The United States believes at this moment that Israel is in no condition to be put under pressure to offer any commitment pertaining to the peace process, so easing the restrictions on Palestinian movement in exchange for a halt to rocket firing seems the most logical thing that one can expect from Israel after the Winograd report. The most recent media reports indicate that US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has postponed her scheduled visit to the region until further notice.

Furthermore, since the publication of the report, we have stopped hearing statements from international officials on the 'emerging window of opportunity' for peace.

The Arab countries were also served by the report as they knew in advance that Israel would not accept the Arab peace initiative. The Winograd report and its political ramifications inside Israel thus saved them from any embarrassment. At least, they can say, they did their share and no one can blame them afterwards. If they want, the Palestinians can blame the Winograd commission.

Experience has taught the Palestinian people that whenever the peace process is activated, an Israeli prime minister resigns or a Winograd report is published. This leads to early elections in Israel and Palestinians are made to wait. This time, the Palestinians are made to wait and in addition suffer economic and political sanctions imposed on them by those parties that exert 'peace efforts' in the region.

Khader Khader is a media analyst with the Jerusalem Media and Communications Center. (c) bitterlemons.org


Print This PageE-mail This PageBookmark This PageIMEU Life and Culture RSS

FEATURES
Blocking a Gazan's path to San Diego
SD Union-Tribune
Palestinian runs towards Olympic dream
The National
Farewell, Mahmoud Darwish
Al-Ahram Weekly

Home > News & Analysis > Analysis > Winograd and the peace process

All content ©2006-2008 Institute for Middle East Understanding

site designed by nigelparry.net