IMEU Logo
The Institute for Middle East Understanding offers journalists and editors quick access to information about Palestine and the Palestinians, as well as expert sources — both in the U.S. and in the Middle East. Read our Background Briefings. Contact us for story assistance. Sign up for e-briefings.
Institute for Middle East UnderstandingBackground Briefings
Donate to IMEU
Home
News & Analysis
Commentary
From the MediaLife & Culture
Cuisine
Customs & Traditions
Film
Literature
Performing Arts
Visual Arts
Palestine in Photos
Art & Culture
Business & Economy
Daily Life
People
Politics
Palestinian Americans
Background Briefings
Documents & Reports
Development & Economy
Historical Documents
Human Rights
Politics & Democracy
Misc.
Maps
Links
Media Inquiries
About IMEU
Donate
Contact

Get E-mail News
Journalists & Editors: Sign up for e-mail briefings here.
Follow the IMEU on Twitter

EDITOR'S PICKS

On civil disobedience
Neve Gordon, The Palestine Chronicle


Gaza families demand answers
Ma'an News


Goldstone and the 'peace process'
George Giacaman, Bitterlemons.org


Advanced SearchSend/E-mail This PageShare/Save This PagePrint This PageAdvanced SearchAccess RSS Feed
Home > Background Briefings
4.7 - What did, in fact, happen at Camp David in 2000?

A Palestinian man wear a button with a picture of the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. (Maan Images)
A Palestinian man wear a button with a picture of the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. (Maan Images)
Israeli, Palestinian, and American leaders met at Camp David in July 2000, to negotiate final status issues, at the invitation of President Bill Clinton. Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) leader Yasser Arafat came reluctantly, believing a leadership summit to be premature, but received reassurance from President Clinton that Palestinians would not be blamed if the meeting were to end without an agreement.

American negotiators advanced a written draft of a proposed agreement, to which Israeli and Palestinian negotiators responded.

Palestinian negotiators consistently offered concessions beyond the international consensus. They were prepared, for example, to accept Israeli annexation of large Jewish settlements in the West Bank, in return for land of equal value and size in Israel, instead of complete Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank. They were also open to Israeli sovereignty over parts of East Jerusalem.

Israeli negotiators, on the other hand, demanded sovereignty or long-term control over 20% of the West Bank, and all of Jerusalem except a few distant Palestinian suburbs. Under the Israeli proposals, the Palestinian areas would have been fragmented into four units, separated from each other by Israeli settlements and their connecting roads, jeopardizing the viability of the prospective Palestinian state.

Both Israeli and Palestinian negotiators were hampered by the vagueness of some of the American proposals, validating Arafat's concern that the summit was premature. In the eyes of Palestinian negotiators, American officials - in particular, Middle East special envoy Dennis Ross - showed clear bias in favor of Israel.

The summit ended without an agreement, after which President Clinton praised Prime Minister Barak's "courage," and, contrary to his earlier promise, blamed the failure of the summit on Arafat and the Palestinians.

Further reading: Shattered Dreams by Charles Enderlin (Other Press); The Truth about Camp David by Clayton Swisher (Nation Books/Avalon Publishing) .


Advanced SearchSend/E-mail This PageShare/Save This PagePrint This PageAdvanced SearchAccess RSS Feed


Home > Background Briefings > 4.7 - What did, in fact, happen at Camp David in 2000?


All content ©2006-2009 Institute for Middle East Understanding

site designed by nigelparry.net